diff options
author | Perberos <[email protected]> | 2011-12-01 23:52:01 -0300 |
---|---|---|
committer | Perberos <[email protected]> | 2011-12-01 23:52:01 -0300 |
commit | 28a029a4990d2a84f9d6a0b890eba812ea503998 (patch) | |
tree | 7a69477d0dd6bf351801fa9698d95224e4fe47b6 /doc/how-to-get-focus-right.txt | |
download | marco-28a029a4990d2a84f9d6a0b890eba812ea503998.tar.bz2 marco-28a029a4990d2a84f9d6a0b890eba812ea503998.tar.xz |
moving from https://github.com/perberos/mate-desktop-environment
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/how-to-get-focus-right.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/how-to-get-focus-right.txt | 253 |
1 files changed, 253 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/how-to-get-focus-right.txt b/doc/how-to-get-focus-right.txt new file mode 100644 index 00000000..45c0f378 --- /dev/null +++ b/doc/how-to-get-focus-right.txt @@ -0,0 +1,253 @@ +To make choice of focus window consistent for each focus method, a +number of guidelines should be followed. (For purposes of discussion +here, I'm excluding things like the panel and the desktop from +"windows". It is technically incorrect to do this, but I'm lazy and +"windows" is shorter than something like "normal windows". See the +end of the discussion for how these special cases are handled.) The +basics are easy: + +Focus method Behavior + click When a user clicks on a window, focus it + sloppy When an EnterNotify is received, focus the window + mouse Same as sloppy, but also defocus when mouse enters DESKTOP + window + +Note that these choices (along with the choice that clicking on a +window raises it for the click focus method) introduces the following +invariants for focus from mouse activity: + +Focus method Invariant + click The window on top is focused + sloppy If the mouse is in a window, then it is focused; if the + mouse is not in a window, then the most recently used + window is focused. + mouse If the mouse is in a non-DESKTOP window, then it is focused; + otherwise, the designated "no_focus_window" is focused + +However, there are a number of cases where the current focus window +becomes invalid and another should be chosen. Some examples are when +a focused window is closed or minimized, or when the user changes +workspaces. In these cases, there needs to be a rule consistent with +the above about the new window to choose. + +Focus method Behavior + click Focus the most recently used window (same as the window + on top) + sloppy Focus the window containing the pointer if there is such + a window, otherwise focus the most recently used window. + mouse Focus the non-DESKTOP window containing the pointer if + there is one, otherwise focus the designated + "no_focus_window". + +Note that "most recently used window", as used here, has a slightly +different connotation than "most recent to have keyboard focus". This +is because when a user activates a window that is a transient, its +ancestor(s) should be considered to be more recently used than other +windows that have had the keyboard focus more recently. (See bug +157360; this may mean that the alt-tab order should also change +simultaneously, although the current implementation does not do that.) + +Also, sometimes a new window will be mapped (e.g. unminimizing a +window or launching a new application). Most users want to interact +with new windows right away, so these should typically be focused. +This does conflict with the invariants for sloppy and mouse focus +modes, so this wouldn't be true for a strict-pointer-focus mode. For +all other modes (non-strict-pointer-focus modes), there are only two +cases in which a new window shouldn't be focused: + + 1) If the window takes a while to launch and the user starts + interacting with a different application, the new window should + not take focus. + 2) If the window that will appear was not launched by the user + (error dialogs, instant messaging windows, etc.), then the window + should not take focus when it appears. + +To handle these cases, Marco compares timestamps of the event that +caused the launch and the timestamp of the last interaction with the +focused window. (Case 2 is handled by the application providing a +special timestamp of 0 for the launch time, which ensures that the +window that appears doesn't get focus) + +If the newly launched window isn't focused, some things should be done +to alert the user that there is a window to work with: + 1) The _NET_WM_DEMANDS_ATTENTION hint should be set + 2) If the new window isn't modal for the focused window, it should + appear below the focused window so that it doesn't obscure the + focused window that the user is interacting with. + 3) If the new window is modal to the focused window, the currently + focused window should lose focus but the modal window should + appear on top. + +Additionally, the user may decide to use the keyboard instead of the mouse +to navigate between windows (referred to as "keynav"). This poses no +problems for click-to-focus (because the same invariant can be +maintained), but for sloppy and mouse focus it requires extra work to +attempt to handle the INHERENTLY CONFLICTING CONSTRAINTS. Marco does +this by having a mouse_mode boolean used to determine which of the two +sets of invariants holds. This mode is set according to which method was +most recently used to choose a focus window: + 1) When receiving EnterNotify events from mouse movement, set + mouse_mode to TRUE. + 2) When using keynav to choose a focus window (e.g. alt-tab, alt-esc, + alt-f2, move-window-to-workspace keybindings), set mouse_mode to FALSE. + 3) When handling events that don't choose a focus window but rather need + a focus_window chosen for them (e.g. switch-to-workspace keybindings), + don't change the mouse_mode and just use the current value. +Note that grabs present a special case since they can generate EnterNotify +and LeaveNotify events without using the mouse, thus these events should be +ignored when the crossing mode is NotifyGrab or NotifyUngrab. THIS +MOUSENAV/KEYNAV MODERATION METHOD IS NOT PERFECT--there are corner cases +when trying to mix-and-match between mousenav and keynav simultaneously +that cause problems; but it appears to be the most reasonable tradeoff and +works well in most cases, especially if the user sticks to just mousenav +for a long time or just keynav for a long time. + +Finally, windows of type WM_DOCK or WM_DESKTOP (e.g. the desktop and +the panel) present a special case, at least partially due to the lack +of decorations. For WM_DESKTOP windows, we only focus them if the +user explicitly requests it (e.g. clicks on the window, uses +Ctrl-Alt-Tab to navigate to it, uses a keybinding to show the desktop, +etc.). For WM_DOCK windows, we do not focus unless we receive a very +explicit request (e.g. Ctrl-Alt-Tab or a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message; +not normal clicks). + + + + +To read more about the bugs that inspired these choices: + - When a focused window becomes invalid and another should be chosen + http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135810 + - When a new window is mapped + http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118372 + Also, the EWMH spec, especially the parts relating to _NET_WM_USER_TIME + - Modal vs. non-modal dialogs that get denied focus when mapped + http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151996 + - Mousenav vs. Keynav in mouse and sloppy focus modes + http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=167545 + http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101190 + http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357695 + - Not focusing panels + http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=160470 + http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120100 + +There were many bugs which had to be fixed to get all the above +working; they helped form these policies and/or show the difficulties +in implementing this policy (my apologies in advance for producing a +list heavily lopsided to what I've done; it's just that these bugs are +the ones I'm the most familiar with): + bug 72314 ignore LeaveNotify events from grabs + bug 82921 focus windows on map + bug 87531 only show focus for sticky windows on active workspace (pager) + bug 94545 focus window on workspace switch is non-deterministic + bug 95747 should ignore EnterNotify events with NotifyInferior detail set + bug 97635 sticky windows always keep focus when switching workspaces + bug 102665 a window unminimized from the tasklist should be focused + bug 107347 focus windows that manually position themselves too + bug 108643 focus in MRU order instead of stack order + bug 110970 moving a window to another workspace loses focus + bug 112031 closing a dialog can result in a strange focus window + bug 115650 add _NET_WM_USER_TIME support to gtk+ (see also 150502) + bug 120100 panel shouldn't be focused after workspace applet usage + bug 123803 need final EnterNotify after workspace switch (see also 124798) + bug 124981 focus clicked window in pager only if on current workspace + bug 125492 catch the xserver unfocusing everything and fix its braindeadedness + bug 128200 focus correct window on libwnck window minimize (see 107681 too) + bug 131582 fix race condition on window minimize/close + bug 133120 wrong window focused when changing workspaces + bug 135024 _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW messages need timestamps + bug 135786 middle-clicking on focused window to lower it should defocus too + bug 136581 window minimization vs. activation for mouse focus + bug 144900 fix focus choice on "un-showing" the desktop + bug 147475 don't lock keyboard on workspace change + bug 148364 DEMANDS_ATTENTION support for marco & libwnck (and other stuff) + bug 149028 focus-stealing-prevention for marco-dialog (and other stuff) + bug 149366 windows denied focus on map occur in wrong order in alt-tab list + bug 149543 consistent focus window when unshowing desktop + bug 149589 race in focus choice from libwnck messages + bug 150271 make sure "run application" dialog gets focused + bug 150668 update gtk+ _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW support + bug 151245 application startup notification forwarding (partially rejected) + bug 151984 Soeren's idea--backup timestamp when startup notification not used + bug 151990 prevent focus inconsistencies by only providing one focus method + bug 151996 modal dialogs denied focus should not be lowered + bug 152000 fix race on window close followed by rapid mouse movement + bug 152004 ways to handle new window versus mouse invariants + bug 153220 catch the root window getting focus and reset to default window + bug 157360 focus parents of dismissed transient windows in preference to + the window that most recently had focus + bug 159257 focus the desktop when showing it + bug 160470 don't focus panels on click + bug 163450 correct highlighting in workspace switcher popup + bug 164716 refuse to focus a window with a modal transient, and focus + the transient instead + bug 166524 avoid new windows being obscured by the focus window + bug 167545 mousenav vs. keynav in mouse and sloppy focus modes + <a massive heap of bugs relating to focus stealing prevention...> + + +Addendum on sloppy and mouse focus + You may occasionally hear people refer to sloppy or mouse focus + modes as inherently buggy. This is what they mean by that: + + 1) Keynav doesn't maintain the same invariants as mouse navigation + for these focus modes; switching back and forth between + navigation methods, therefore, may have or appear to have + inconsistencies. Examples: + a) If the user uses Alt-Tab to change the window with focus, then + starts to move the mouse, at that moment the window where the + mouse is does not have focus. + b) Users expect that a workspace they previously used will not + change when the return to it. This means things like window + position and stacking order, but also the focus window. + Unfortunately, using the original focus window (which would be + the most recently used window on that workspace) will + sometimes conflict with the invariants for mouse and sloppy + focus modes. Users are much more surprised by the invariant + being broken than by having the focus window changed (see bug + 94545 and probably others), so we maintain the invariant. + This only matters when using Ctrl-Alt-Arrow to switch + workspaces instead of clicking in the workspace switcher, so + this really is a keynav vs mouse issue. Either that, or a + windows-are-being-mapped exception. ;-) + c) Opening a menu, then moving the mouse to a different window, + and then pressing escape to dismiss the menu will result in + the window containing the mouse not being focused. This is + actually correct behavior (because pressing escape shows that + the user is using key navigation to interact with the window + containing the menu) but is one of those hard-to-get-right + keynav and mouse focus mixture cases. (See bug 101190 for + more details) + d) Similar to (c), moving the mouse off the menu doesn't immediately + focus the window that the mouse goes over, due to an application + grab (we couldn't change this and wouldn't want to, but + technically it does break the invariant). + e) If mouse_mode is off and the user does something to cause focus to + change (e.g. switch workspaces, close or minimize a window, etc.) + and simultaneously tries to move the mouse, the choice of which + window to focus is inherently race-y. (You probably can't satisfy + both keynav and mousenav invariants simultaneously...) + 2) The sloppy/mouse invariants are often not strictly maintained; + for example, we provide an exception to the invariant for newly + mapped windows. (Most find that not allowing this exception is + confusing) + 3) There are an awful lot of little cases to handle to get any focus + mode right, even for click-to-focus. Since mouse and sloppy + focus have sometimes been hard to even determine what correct + behavior is, it is much harder to get them completely right. + Plus mouse and sloppy focus users are a minority, decreasing the + motivation of window manager implementors to get those focus + modes right. + 4) Because of -1-, -2-, and -3-, implementations are often buggy or + inconsistent and people form their opinions from usage of these + implementations. + 5) Sloppy focus suffers from a bit of a discoverability problem (for + example, I have seen a scientist sit down to a computer for which + sloppy focus was in use and take a few minutes before figuring + out how window activation worked; granted the layout of the + windows in that situation was a bit unusual but it still + illustrates that sloppy focus is harder than it should be to + figure out). Mouse focus solves this problem; however, people + that have experience with other computing environments are + accustomed to being able to move their mouse outside the window + they are working with and still continue interacting with that + window, which conflicts with mouse focus. |