Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
A prior commit switched from focusing the topmost window as the default
window to focusing the MRU window. This was done in alignment with the
introduction of per-workspace MRU lists to avoid problems where the window
stack was inadvertently changed when focusing windows during window switches.
Now that focusing windows don't have as big an impact on the stacking order,
we can revert back to focusing the top window, which is less confusing to the
user.
For now, leave per-workspace MRU lists, as they're a pretty good approximation
of a global MRU list, and it works well enough.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620744
Based on commit https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/-/commit/f628d8f8901f46fa9e00707ae9d7ccfd1e85f427
|
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620744
Based on commit https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/-/commit/9245f9588bd7c17ccbe04df65c1579313cbad07b
|
|
commit.
Partially restore call to destroy_win in compositor when calling
meta_window_free. This is needed to ensure that we never call
meta_window_get_frame_bounds while windows is destroying.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751833
Based on commit https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/-/commit/a9f28dbc26f5211ef08889109db3dc8c7ba76aca
|
|
Based on commit https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/-/commit/24d35569bdb78d1da3b53ed1a6d81d365d60bed0
|
|
Also reformat recent code change to fix styling issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/1fafd279006ece8cf664fd777143cdfafbefad6d
window: handle legacy fullscreen requests
Doing this on the actual resize requests makes more sense
than handling it as a window-manager imposed constraints,
so move the code accordingly.
Adapted from mutter patch by Florian Müllner:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/mutter/commit/?id=fba022cc06b8c7e80ef36f48d6577a251384cc4b
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781946
Bug 781946 - Non-native decorated windows stuck maximised on secondary screen with Marco/Metacity
|
|
|
|
Origin commit :
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/c87f73f3b4413720a2f3e6a672826d3fec7f77a9
"
XmbTextPropertyToTextList documentation says that XFreeStringList
should be used to free the storage for the list and its contents.
"
|
|
Adding a new option to allow tile size cycling. When enabled, using the
keyboard shortcut for tiling multiple times in a row cycles the window
through different sizes (1/2 -> 1/3 -> 1/4 -> 3/4 -> 2/3 -> Untiled).
|
|
Instead of converting from surface to a GdkPixbuf and then back to
a surface, we keep it as a surface for the entire manipulation flow.
This improves rendering speed a bit and sets the ground for a higher
resolution thumbnail in the future.
|
|
|
|
Eeeks, testing floating points for equality ...
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/commit/0fccb0fc8
|
|
core/testboxes.c:34:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:103:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:120:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:148:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:167:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:190:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:589:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:681:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:725:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:842:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:904:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:1021:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:1154:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:1243:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:1344:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
core/testboxes.c:1396:1: warning: function declaration isn’t a prototype [-Wstrict-prototypes]
|
|
Use the window's visual in all cases, fix problems with drivers forcing use of blit rather than pageflip mode when comppositing is not used or window is unredirected
Apply https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/5863176a2bd659c8d9a3d1c7b023a27c1a8c0aa5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixes Clang static analyzer warning:
core/async-getprop.c:277:11: warning: Casting a non-structure type to a structure type and accessing a field can lead to memory access errors or data corruption
reply = (xGetPropertyReply *)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
Fixes Clang static analyzer warnings:
core/xprops.c:761:9: warning: Casting a non-structure type to a structure type and accessing a field can lead to memory access errors or data corruption
raw = (xPropWMHints*) results->prop;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
core/xprops.c:883:9: warning: Casting a non-structure type to a structure type and accessing a field can lead to memory access errors or data corruption
raw = (xPropSizeHints*) results->prop;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
When changing window state, we want to change the allowed action hints
so that other applications, mainly the taskbar, can disable menu entries
that do not make much visual sense. For example, unmaximizing
a minimized window: even though this operation is possible, it causes
user confusion as there is no visibility until the user unminimizes it.
|
|
|
|
Since the frame window size that meta_window_move_resize() uses depends
on whether the window has horizontal/vertical resize functionality, we
need to update this flag before we resize the window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659854
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/c66d83a7
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/ca475d44
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/74db1f11
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/cd383e72
|
|
We should still correct the coordinates for withdrawn windows.
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/9da3004e
|
|
When we reparent a window to the root when we're exiting, we need to offset
the position by the invisible borders, otherwise windows will creep up and
to the left.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660848
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/9fe51fd0
|
|
_NET_FRAME_EXTENTS should contain the difference between where a window asked
to be placed, and where it is. Ideally, this should be the same as the visible
extents.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659848
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/a3630d7c
|
|
A window can specify geometry that it is placed at. We need to exclude invisible
borders when calculating where to place the window, otherwise the window will have
a strange offset.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659848
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/95373187
|
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656619
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/4674358f
|
|
get_outer_rect now returns the visible region, and a new get_input_rect
method returns the boundaries of the full frame, including the possible
invisible regions. When undecorated, both do the samething.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/dfedc7df
|
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/85e15225
|
|
This just adds the invisible border field and populates it with
data but doesn't use it in any way.
Based on mutter commit:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/mutter/commit/?id=a1a2527c75ab0c135f89396ea036336fb67ac538
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/bf02c7c3
|
|
MetaFrameBorders leaked when orig_borders != NULL and
window->fullscreen == TRUE
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679153
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/7e7f25f4
|
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628195
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/3994d7a0
|
|
Since window->frame_bounds is used as a cache we need to invalidate it when
destroying the frame.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660773
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/330ff9b5
|
|
An ARGB window with a frame is likely something like a transparent
terminal. It looks awful (and breaks transparency) to draw a big
opaque black shadow under the window, so clip out the region under
the terminal from the shadow we draw.
Add meta_window_get_frame_bounds() to get a cairo region for the
outer bounds of the frame of a window, and modify the frame handling
code to notice changes to the frame shape and discard a cached
region. meta_frames_apply_shapes() is refactored so we can extract
meta_frames_get_frame_bounds() from it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635268
NOTE: Applied only partially, compositor part is still missing...
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/0f2e32d1
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/5404d8f2
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/67ddadf3
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/96d7a662
|
|
Based on a patch by Thomas Jaeger <[email protected]>
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/03e8e63d
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/5b880ff3
|
|
Like the setting of new frames' background is delayed until the
frame is associated with its window, delay attaching the initial
style, so that the correct style variant is picked.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645355
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/ee056853
|
|
When the _GTK_THEME_VARIANT property changes, rather than just
updating the window's theme_variant property, update its frame
style as well, so that the window decoration reflects the requested
variant. As the initial properties of a window may be read before
its frame is created, there will be cases where the change is not
picked up initially.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645355
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/8a779ab9
|
|
To associate frames with the correct style variant, the UI will
need access to the window's theme variant property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645355
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/5c7403cc
|
|
Since version 3.0, GTK+ has support for style variants. At the moment,
themes may provide a dark variant, which can be requested by
applications via GtkSettings. The requested variant is exported to
X11 via the _GTK_THEME_VARIANT property - support this property, in
order to pick up the correct style variant in the future.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645355
NOTE: Patch is adapted for marco.
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/341d0945
|