Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Files | Lines |
|
finally, apps that prefer dark theme variant (gtk-application-prefer-dark-theme
in GtkSettings) should also have dark window decorations
taken from:
https://github.com/GNOME/metacity/commit/6b0d325442b995a78b8783384f7ec370db1369a4
|
|
|
|
- this will be needed for proper window decoration color updates on theme change
when theme variants fixes are applied
- realize/unrealize functions are dropped instead of map/unmap ones, because
we didn't change these during GTK+3 porting
- MetaFrames now has GtkWindow as parent instead of GtkInvisible, otherwise
the hack doesn't work (revert part of 96c7256d638b8c76c8abf786ba307e82a595dd67)
adapted from:
https://github.com/GNOME/metacity/commit/ba8500663457ad9f18ebfdf405162c2cb5caf88f
|
|
and make variable names less similar
taken from:
https://github.com/linuxmint/muffin/commit/6120bddefd709d3f1
|
|
guess it was overlooked when porting to GTK+3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When changing window state, we want to change the allowed action hints
so that other applications, mainly the taskbar, can disable menu entries
that do not make much visual sense. For example, unmaximizing
a minimized window: even though this operation is possible, it causes
user confusion as there is no visibility until the user unminimizes it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partially restore call to destroy_win in compositor when calling
meta_window_free. This is needed to ensure that we never call
meta_window_get_frame_bounds while windows is destroying.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751833
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/a9f28dbc
|
|
Since the frame window size that meta_window_move_resize() uses depends
on whether the window has horizontal/vertical resize functionality, we
need to update this flag before we resize the window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659854
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/c66d83a7
|
|
GTK+ theme might use this area to paint box-shadow. Also use
CAIRO_CONTENT_COLOR_ALPHA for cairo surfaces.
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/13137b1d
|
|
... to differentiate PangoLayout from MetaFrameLayout.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741917
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/8e5781bc
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/3a3c47e3
|
|
With compositing manager:
1. Apply only client shape.
Without compositing manager:
1. Apply client shape.
2. Apply shape around visible frame.
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/3913dcf1
|
|
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/ca475d44
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/72003d38
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/74db1f11
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/cd383e72
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/94c8d620
|
|
The condition got removed in eeb2efe01001fef7655b2ba95ca1456f7fe9214b but that
had a side effect of adding a couple of rows of dead pixels so add it back.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658069
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/37e1fa8c
|
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=662895
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/6836a621
|
|
We should still correct the coordinates for withdrawn windows.
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/9da3004e
|
|
When we reparent a window to the root when we're exiting, we need to offset
the position by the invisible borders, otherwise windows will creep up and
to the left.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660848
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/9fe51fd0
|
|
_NET_FRAME_EXTENTS should contain the difference between where a window asked
to be placed, and where it is. Ideally, this should be the same as the visible
extents.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659848
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/a3630d7c
|
|
Invisible borders are all about resizing -- in the case that a window
cannot be resized, it makes no sense to add them.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659854
Based on mutter commit:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/mutter/commit/?id=be9f7d77292c1dfd868640fe95f7223fbbfd4273
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/64615667
|
|
A window can specify geometry that it is placed at. We need to exclude invisible
borders when calculating where to place the window, otherwise the window will have
a strange offset.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659848
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/95373187
|
|
Shaded windows are assumed to be reduced to the titlebar: the
current code enforces a visible bottom border of 0 and only takes
the size of the title bar (+ invisible top border) into account
when resizing the frame. However, we still add an invisible border
at the bottom, which is than subtracted from the title bar, resulting
in shaded windows being cut off.
Fix by forcing both visible and invisible bottom borders to 0.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=659266
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/7a80fcfd
|
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=656619
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/4674358f
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/9fd053da
|
|
get_outer_rect now returns the visible region, and a new get_input_rect
method returns the boundaries of the full frame, including the possible
invisible regions. When undecorated, both do the samething.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/dfedc7df
|
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/85e15225
|
|
... and start compensating for invisible borders in all of the math.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
NOTE: Updated for marco...
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/daf6bc08
|
|
This just adds the invisible border field and populates it with
data but doesn't use it in any way.
Based on mutter commit:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/mutter/commit/?id=a1a2527c75ab0c135f89396ea036336fb67ac538
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/bf02c7c3
|
|
This adds 'invisible_border' to be used for resize cursor area.
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/215dd8e9
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/28970472
|
|
MetaFrameBorders leaked when orig_borders != NULL and
window->fullscreen == TRUE
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679153
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/7e7f25f4
|
|
This makes it a bit simpler for other functions on a MetaUIFrame to
get this information.
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697758
Reviewed-by: Jasper St. Pierre <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <[email protected]>
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/79384de0
|
|
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628195
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/3994d7a0
|
|
Since window->frame_bounds is used as a cache we need to invalidate it when
destroying the frame.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660773
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/330ff9b5
|
|
An ARGB window with a frame is likely something like a transparent
terminal. It looks awful (and breaks transparency) to draw a big
opaque black shadow under the window, so clip out the region under
the terminal from the shadow we draw.
Add meta_window_get_frame_bounds() to get a cairo region for the
outer bounds of the frame of a window, and modify the frame handling
code to notice changes to the frame shape and discard a cached
region. meta_frames_apply_shapes() is refactored so we can extract
meta_frames_get_frame_bounds() from it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635268
NOTE: Applied only partially, compositor part is still missing...
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/0f2e32d1
|
|
Commit https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/c3a04bf
unintentionally broke XShape handling. By studying the code
extremely carefully, I found this inconsistency with the code that was
there before.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635268
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/2b1c6443
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/5404d8f2
|
|
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/67ddadf3
|
|
The style context of the widget is rarely what we want. We won't
fix this to be a MetaFrames style context yet; this just changes
the internal API.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690317
upstream commit:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/metacity/commit/76aa0704
|